<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hit the Hut, or hit the depths of desperation.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://johnnylyle.co.uk/2009/06/19/hit-the-hut-or-hit-the-depths-of-desperation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://johnnylyle.co.uk/2009/06/19/hit-the-hut-or-hit-the-depths-of-desperation/</link>
	<description>An insight into branding, how it works and why it sometimes doesn&#039;t</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 15:00:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Denise Lee Yohn</title>
		<link>http://johnnylyle.co.uk/2009/06/19/hit-the-hut-or-hit-the-depths-of-desperation/#comment-87</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Denise Lee Yohn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 19:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnnylyle.co.uk/?p=304#comment-87</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[very entertaining -- and thought-provoking -- post!

i am flummoxed by the move to &quot;the hut&quot; -- i don&#039;t think the company is doing this in an effort to reposition itself as a healthy choice for salads, etc. -- it&#039;s more likely that they want to increase usage occasions -- after all, other than wasted college students and hungry kids, most people don&#039;t eat pizza with as much frequency as is necessary to the sustain the growth in traffic counts and comp store sales that most restaurants are seeking -- so, if pizza hut were to be associated more with other food choices, the chain would benefit from more frequent usage -- or so the logic would seem to go.

problem is, pizza is what makes pizza hut pizza hut -- and what makes it different and special -- walking away from that equity (as bloaty and fat-based as it may be) just doesn&#039;t seem right.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very entertaining &#8212; and thought-provoking &#8212; post!</p>
<p>i am flummoxed by the move to &#8220;the hut&#8221; &#8212; i don&#8217;t think the company is doing this in an effort to reposition itself as a healthy choice for salads, etc. &#8212; it&#8217;s more likely that they want to increase usage occasions &#8212; after all, other than wasted college students and hungry kids, most people don&#8217;t eat pizza with as much frequency as is necessary to the sustain the growth in traffic counts and comp store sales that most restaurants are seeking &#8212; so, if pizza hut were to be associated more with other food choices, the chain would benefit from more frequent usage &#8212; or so the logic would seem to go.</p>
<p>problem is, pizza is what makes pizza hut pizza hut &#8212; and what makes it different and special &#8212; walking away from that equity (as bloaty and fat-based as it may be) just doesn&#8217;t seem right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

